Meanwhile on ArsTechnica:

> I abhor bad logic.
>
> Do you get frustrated when people insist that global warming isn’t real despite evidence?
> Do you get frustrated when people insist that evolution isn’t real despite evidence?
> Do you get frustrated when people insist that the earth is 6000 years old?
>
> Evidence and logic are the foundations of a rationale discussion. With the evidence at our disposal, we can make rational conclusions about what kind of games the average person buys. We can analyze what factors into their purchasing decisions, and we can make rational guesses as to what they’ll buy based on past observations.
>
> If you believe that a console with fewer NEW, AAA games can sell more units, despite being more expensive than the competition, despite not being inherently more powerful than the competition, and despite the fact that the purchasing itself is more convoluted, then it flies in the face of the most cursory examinations of purchasing decisions. It is laughably illogical to presume that this product will suddenly change every market dynamic that has been prevalent in video game console history without a coherent reason for it to do so.
>
> When someone presents such a reason, I will gladly acknowledge it and admit my error.

[Permalink](http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2015/02/the-state-of-linux-gaming-in-the-steamos-era/?comments=1&post=28559595)