You wouldn’t be talking so tough in person because I’d punch your teeth down your throat. Scientists who have devoted their entire lives to science will tell you that a stationary earth cannot be debunked. With the mathematics and physics we know today a stationary earth is just as viable as a spinning, orbiting and shooting around in space one. You clearly haven’t read any books. Try it for once instead of acting tough behind a computer screen. Try looking into the model before criticising it. I’m well aware that a simple minded person like you is incapable of doing so. Explain to me why Einstein in his book the evolution of physics says the following. “The struggle, so violent in the early days of science, between the views of Ptolemy and Copernicus would then be quite meaningless. Either coordinate system could be used with equal justification. The two sentences, ‘the sun is at rest and the earth moves,’ or ‘the sun moves and the earth is at rest,’ would simply mean two different conventions concerning two different coordinate systems.” The free pdf version is available online. You can read journals by astronomers of today as well. George Ellis is quoted as saying the following, he published a paper on it as well. People need to be aware that there is a range of models that could explain the observations. For instance, I can construct you a spherically symmetrical universe with Earth at its center, and you cannot disprove it based on observations. You can only exclude it on philosophical grounds. In my view there is absolutely nothing wrong in that. What I want to bring into the open is the fact that we are using philosophical criteria in choosing our models. A lot of cosmology tries to hide that.” I’m sure you’ll have nothing to say other than nonsense from a sensitive princess only capable of insults.

[Source](https://www.instagram.com/p/BbEyox-FStI/?taken-by=johnkrausphotos) / [screenshot](https://imgur.com/Pvut1UM.jpg)