Mario and Call of Duty, two major game series of the current generation. But which one’s better?

First of all, the most important part, the graphics. The graphics of Mario games are usually terrible due to Nintendo’s bad hardware and they’re a complete eyesore to look at. I might as well just smear feces all over my television because that would look better than any Mario game. Call of Duty, on the other hand, has amazing, stunning graphics that I don’t think could ever be done by anything Nintendo has put out.

Gameplay wise, we have a stunning combat and movement system in Call of Duty with an amazing amount of replay value with great online multiplayer, and tons of other modes. Mario, on the other hand, only has a crappy single player mode with levels and usually all you do is jump around and collect stuff. Lame. Call of Duty is so much more advanced than Mario, yet Mario has a higher rating on review sites, which is dumb. I’m positive that Nintendo pays these big review sites to give higher ratings.

Overall, Mario is boring and unplayable with awful graphics and because it’s so bad i’m going to give it a 2/10, being generous. Call of Duty, on the other hand, deserves a perfect 10/10 as it’s a much better and more interesting game. You often get map packs for $15 almost every other month, and you get a new game every single year. When do new Mario games come out, every 3 years? Yeah, it’s obvious to see that Call of Duty is easily the winner in this case.